Ohio Court of Appeals, Seventh District · 2006

Pierce v. Pierce

Pierce v. Pierce, 2006-Ohio-4953 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th 2006)

Holding

The court held that parental smoking may be considered in a best-interest custody analysis and discussed recognized respiratory risks from secondhand smoke. It did not decide that secondhand smoke causes cognitive or neurodevelopmental injury.

Precedent health-check

Unknown · 0 citing

Subsequent treatment has not been assessed.

Treatment last confirmed August 19, 2026. Case-wide subsequent treatment; human-set. Not specific to any one passage.

Read the opinion

Claims relevant to this case

Prenatal and childhood secondhand tobacco-smoke exposure is associated at the population level with small differences in some cognitive, executive-function, attention, learning, and developmental outcomes, but findings are inconsistent across domains and exposure windows.
Evidence: HighConsensus: Established Certified· developmental risk & environment