Loading the library…
family law / same-sex parenting & child outcomes
Established that children of same-sex parents do not differ in psychological, cognitive, or social adjustment from children of different-sex parents.
Meta-analyses across dozens of studies find no moderation of child adjustment by parental sexual orientation (Fedewa et al., 2015; Suárez et al., 2022), the longest prospective study (the National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study) reports healthy adolescent adjustment (Gartrell & Bos, 2010), and observational studies show family-process variables, not family type, drive outcomes (Golombok et al., 2017). Early studies drew methodological critiques (Marks, 2012), but later representative and longitudinal work upholds the no-difference finding.
Fedewa, A. L., Black, W. W., & Ahn, S (2015). Children and Adolescents With Same-Gender Parents: A Meta-Analytic Approach in Assessing Outcomes. Journal of GLBT Family Studies.
Meta-analysis
Child psychological adjustment, cognitive ability, gender identity, and sexual orientation were NOT moderated by parent gender or sexual orientation; significant differences appeared only on parent-child relationship and gender-role behavior.
Bearing on this claim: Meta-analysis: child adjustment/cognition not moderated by parental sexual orientation.
doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2013.869486Suárez, M., et al (2022). A meta-analysis examining the relationship between parents' sexual orientation and children's developmental outcomes. Journal of Family Studies.
Some early studies used small or convenience samples; long-term and population-representative data, though now stronger, remain less extensive than for other family forms; and outcomes like experienced stigma reflect others' prejudice rather than parenting.
Last reviewed June 28, 2026
Meta-analysis
The overall effect of having same-sex parents on child developmental outcomes was positive and not different from (if not slightly better than) children of heterosexual parents.
Bearing on this claim: Meta-analysis (32 studies): overall positive, no disadvantage.
Gartrell, N., & Bos, H (2010). US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: Psychological Adjustment of 17-Year-Old Adolescents. Pediatrics.
Longitudinal
In the largest, longest-running prospective study of planned lesbian families, 17-year-olds were rated higher in social, academic, and total competence and lower in problem behavior than an age-matched normative sample.
Bearing on this claim: NLLFS prospective cohort: healthy adolescent adjustment.
doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3153Golombok, S., Blake, L., Slutsky, J., et al (2017). Parenting and the Adjustment of Children Born to Gay Fathers Through Surrogacy. Child Development.
Observational
Children in gay-father and lesbian-mother families showed high levels of adjustment; family-process variables (perceived stigma, negative parenting), not family type, predicted child externalizing problems.
Bearing on this claim: Gay-father/lesbian-mother families: family process, not type, predicts adjustment.
doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12728Counter-authority (1). Studies an adversary may cite — surfaced deliberately so the grade is honest about its limits.
Marks, L (2012). Same-sex parenting and children's outcomes: A closer examination of the American Psychological Association's brief on lesbian and gay parenting. Social Science Research.
Review
METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE: argues the APA brief's "no disadvantage" assertion outran the evidence, citing homogeneous/convenience samples, weak comparison groups, limited outcomes, scarce long-term data, and low statistical power in many early studies.
Bearing on this claim: Methodological critique of the APA brief's "no disadvantage" claim (sampling, power, long-term data).
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.19377624 supporting · 1 counter verified sources