U.S. Supreme Court · 2010
Graham v. Florida
560 U.S. 48 (2010)
Holding
Held that the Eighth Amendment forbids life without parole for a juvenile offender who did not commit homicide; the State must give such offenders a meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation. The Court relied on juveniles' diminished culpability and capacity for change, noting that developments in psychology and brain science show that parts of the brain involved in behavior control continue to mature through late adolescence.
Claims this case relied on
Adolescents have a diminished capacity for self-regulation and impulse control relative to adults; the neural systems supporting cognitive control and behavioral inhibition mature gradually across adolescence and do not reach adult levels until the late teens to early twenties.
Evidence strength: HighScientific consensus: Established· adolescent self-regulation / impulse controlAdolescent personality and character are still forming and are not reliable indicators of fixed adult character; most adolescents who engage in antisocial behavior, including serious offending, desist as they mature, so adolescent conduct is a poor predictor of irretrievable depravity.
Evidence strength: HighScientific consensus: Established· adolescent personality development / desistanceAdolescents weigh risks and rewards differently from adults: a reward-sensitive socio-emotional system matures earlier than the cognitive-control system, producing heightened reward-seeking, a weaker orientation to the future, and steeper discounting of delayed consequences during adolescence.
Evidence strength: HighScientific consensus: Established· adolescent risk/reward processingThe structural maturation of the human brain -- including cortical gray-matter thinning and continued development of white-matter connectivity in regions that support cognitive control -- continues throughout adolescence and into the early-to-mid twenties, later than the maturation of many other organ systems.
Evidence strength: HighScientific consensus: Established· adolescent structural neurodevelopmentStructured, developmentally-appropriate interventions can, on average, reduce reoffending among juveniles; as a group, adolescents are responsive to rehabilitation -- though effects are modest and depend strongly on the type of program, the targeting of higher-risk youth, and the quality of implementation.
Evidence strength: ModerateScientific consensus: Established· juvenile rehabilitation / intervention effectiveness