Claims
Each claim is a legally operative assertion, reviewed on two transparent axes. Filter by domain or legal issue.
DomainAlladolescent adjudicative competenceadolescent legal competence / Miranda waiveradolescent personality development / desistanceadolescent risk/reward processingadolescent self-regulation / impulse controladolescent social influence / coercionadolescent structural neurodevelopmentchildhood adversity / developmental criminologydevelopmental factors in interrogationfalse confessions / interrogation reliabilityjuvenile rehabilitation / intervention effectiveness
Legal issueAllCapacity for Change & RehabilitationChildhood Trauma & MitigationCustodial Interrogation & Confessions of MinorsDeterrence & the Penological Aims of SentencingJuvenile Competence & AdjudicationJuvenile Culpability & Diminished ResponsibilityJuvenile Sentencing & the Eighth AmendmentYouth, Interrogation & Confession Reliability
2 claims
Adolescent personality and character are still forming and are not reliable indicators of fixed adult character; most adolescents who engage in antisocial behavior, including serious offending, desist as they mature, so adolescent conduct is a poor predictor of irretrievable depravity.
Evidence strength: HighScientific consensus: Established· adolescent personality development / desistanceStructured, developmentally-appropriate interventions can, on average, reduce reoffending among juveniles; as a group, adolescents are responsive to rehabilitation -- though effects are modest and depend strongly on the type of program, the targeting of higher-risk youth, and the quality of implementation.
Evidence strength: ModerateScientific consensus: Established· juvenile rehabilitation / intervention effectiveness