Showing 4 verified claims · instruction & learning disabilities
Computerized working-memory training (e.g., Cogmed) reliably improves performance on the trained and closely similar memory tasks (near transfer), but multiple high-quality meta-analyses and randomized trials show it does NOT produce meaningful or lasting improvements in general cognitive ability or academic achievement (far transfer).
Facilitated communication (FC, "supported typing") is not a valid communication technique: controlled authorship studies unanimously show that FC-generated messages are authored by the facilitator rather than the person with a disability, no new validating evidence has emerged, and every major professional body opposes its use — so statements produced through FC, including abuse allegations, cannot be attributed to the person with the disability.
Explicit, systematic phonics-based (structured literacy) instruction improves foundational reading and spelling for students with or at risk for reading disabilities, including dyslexia; it is the reading-disability treatment approach with the most clearly confirmed efficacy in randomized trials, with moderate effects largest on decoding and word reading, smaller on comprehension, and stronger when begun early.