Loading the library…
Showing 7 verified claims · adolescent development & culpability
Adolescents are more susceptible than adults to peer influence and to external pressure or coercion, with susceptibility greatest in mid-adolescence; the mere presence of peers measurably increases adolescents' risk-taking and shifts their decisions toward immediate rewards.
Adolescents have a diminished capacity for self-regulation and impulse control relative to adults; the neural systems supporting cognitive control and behavioral inhibition mature gradually across adolescence and do not reach adult levels until the late teens to early twenties.
Adolescents weigh risks and rewards differently from adults: a reward-sensitive socio-emotional system matures earlier than the cognitive-control system, producing heightened reward-seeking, a weaker orientation to the future, and steeper discounting of delayed consequences during adolescence.
At the population level, childhood adversity — adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) such as abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, and a harmful family or home environment — is associated with an elevated risk of adolescent antisocial and delinquent conduct, in a graded, dose-response pattern (more cumulative adversity, higher average risk).
The structural maturation of the human brain — including cortical gray-matter thinning and continued development of white-matter connectivity in regions that support cognitive control — continues throughout adolescence and into the early-to-mid twenties, later than the maturation of many other organ systems.
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) produce robust, well-replicated deficits in executive functioning — working memory, inhibition, planning, and set-shifting — and in adaptive functioning that persist independent of IQ; because these organically based impairments bear directly on reasoning, impulse control, and capacity to foresee consequences, they are recognized as legitimately mitigating of criminal culpability by analogy to intellectual disability.
Justice-involved youth carry a markedly elevated burden of traumatic brain injury: roughly 30% of juvenile offenders report a prior TBI — more than three times the odds of comparison youth — with prevalence in custodial samples ranging from about 17% to over 70% depending on definition and method, and TBI histories clustering with mental-health, substance-use, and behavioral problems that bear on culpability assessment, screening, and rehabilitation.