Loading the library…
Showing 5 verified claims · competence, interrogation & confessions
A child's age objectively affects how they experience police questioning: minors are more susceptible than adults to perceived pressure and authority, are more suggestible, and are at greater risk of falsely confessing, so age is materially relevant to whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave or to remain silent.
Juveniles are over-represented among proven false confessions, and adolescents are at elevated risk of false confession relative to adults — a dispositional vulnerability (immaturity of judgment, suggestibility, and compliance with authority) that interacts with situational interrogation pressure. The claim concerns the composition of known and proven cases and comparative risk, not a known absolute rate among all juvenile confessions.
Juveniles, especially those age 15 and younger, frequently do not adequately comprehend or appreciate the Miranda warnings they waive: as a group they understand the words of the warnings, and the function and significance of the rights to silence and counsel, less well than adults — raising doubt about whether a juvenile's waiver is knowing and intelligent.
Psychopathy and callous-unemotional designations applied to adolescents carry moderate group-level predictive validity for offending (meta-analytic r ≈ .24, with some incremental value beyond antisocial history), but their stability into adulthood is genuinely contested — traits decline on average and roughly a third of high-scoring institutionalized youth show substantial decreases over ten years, while serious-offender cohorts show majority rank-order stability — so an adolescent "psychopath" label cannot be treated as a finding of fixed adult character in sentencing or disposition.